HAVE THE COURAGE TO Pass the "No Kings Act" immediately-(MODIFY IT TO BE GENDER NEUTRAL) it states
(https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/4973/text)
SEC. 2. Findings and purposes.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds that—
(1) no person, including any President, is above the law;
(2) Congress, under the Necessary and Proper Clause of section 8 of article I of the Constitution of the United States, has the authority to determine to which persons the criminal laws of the United States shall apply, including any President;
(3) the Constitution of the United States does not grant to any President any form of immunity (whether absolute, presumptive, or otherwise) from criminal prosecution, including for actions committed while serving as President;
(4) in The Federalist No. 69, Alexander Hamilton wrote that there must be a difference between the "sacred and inviolable" king of Great Britain and the President of the United States, who "would be amenable to personal punishment and disgrace" should his actions violate the laws of the United States;
(5) the United States District Court for the District of Columbia correctly concluded in United States v. Trump, No. 23–257 (TSC), 2023 WL 8359833 (D.D.C. December 1, 2023) that "former Presidents do not possess absolute federal criminal immunity for any acts committed while in office", that former Presidents "may be subject to federal investigation, indictment, prosecution, conviction, and punishment for any criminal acts undertaken while in office", and that a "four-year service as Commander in Chief [does] not bestow on [a President] the divine right of kings to evade the criminal accountability that governs his fellow citizens";
