Stop Amendment of EIA Notification 2006
- von: Syed Tanveeruddin
- empfänger: Hon'ble Supreme Court, Election Comn of India or ECI, President, PM, MoEF
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/eianotification2009/
Appeal to the PM against the EIA Notification_Amendment_2009 PDF
1st list of endorsements in ESG petition sent to PM on March 30
Last Petition Update: Tue, Mar 31, 2009 @ 09:45 hrs Indian Std Time
The MoEF (Ministry of Environment & Forests) in a notification issued recently proposes to amend the EIA or Environment Impact Assessment Notification in such a manner that it will negate the very purpose of the Notification, besides compromising human rights of hundreds of project affected communities and the ecological security of India.
It is striking to note that amendment is proposed at the time of General Elections, and that the beneficiaries are the some of the largest corporate houses involved in mining, petrochemicals, manufacturing, construction, infrastructure development, dam building, etc.
All of these sectors are highly polluting and environmentally destructive and the benefit of a weak environmental regime, including exemptions from compliance with significant provisions of environmental regulatory procedures, would help these sectors save thousands of crores in monetary terms alone.
In effect therefore, the proposed amendments amount to the extension of a largesse from the State to highly profit making industrial and infrastructure sectors.
It is well known that corporate houses fund political parties and have consistently demanded and lobbied for a weak environmental clearance regime, including exemptions.
This is exactly what is now proposed by the move to amend the EIA Notification (which is anyway very weak).
The Election Commission of India has a Code of Conduct for political parties which requires that a Party in power should not initiate significant shifts in policies, schemes and regulatory practices that may secure benefits for some sectors and amount to the extention of largesse of the State.
The timing of the proposed amendments and the proposed changes in law leave little doubt about the possibility that the UPA Government at the Centre may have initiated these reforms to secure support of benefiting corporates to its party coffers.
The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has proposed a major amendment to the Environment Impact Assessment Notification - 2006 by way of Notification S.O. 195 (E) issued on 19 January 2009. Following the closure of the public commenting period of 60 days, MoEF proposes to go ahead with the amendments anytime now.
The EIA Notification 2006 requires that projects that cause pollution, displacement, destruction of natural resources, etc., be they in the nature of expansion or as greenfield ventures, must go through a series of clearance steps as per standards and with the prior consent of a variety of statutory agencies, both at the State and Central levels, as applicable.
The procedures laid down requires project developers to comply with various national legislations such as the Environment Protection Act, Forest Conservation Act, Wildlife Protection Act, Water and Air (Control of Pollution) Act, and a range of international treaties, in particular the Rio Declaration of 1992.
In addition a variety of legal principles that are part of the rubric of Indian law, such as Polluter Pays Principle, Doctrine of Public Trust, Precautionary Principle, etc., are to be adhered to when advancing any developmental project.
Failure to comply with the procedures laid down in the EIA Notification is a criminal offence punishable under the Environment Protection Act, 1986 and related criminal procedure laws.
The Amendment Notification proposes a series of amendments to the EIA Notification 2006 which will significantly weaken, even negate, the role of the Ministry and other statutory agencies in reviewing the environmental and social impacts of a variety of high impact and polluting projects.
In addition, the amendment proposes to grant a range of exemptions from mandatory statutory provisions of applicable environmental law for upto three years.
There is also an extraordinary and clearly illegal concession offered to polluters who simply have to declare through a 'self certification' that they cause no additional pollution and thus escape from the need to secure environmental clearance!
In a country which is known for its gross failure in enforcement of environmental regulations, and where there is no competent administrative and regulatory infrastructure to independently review compliance with law, this is certain to open the floodgates to environmental destruction and destabilisation of thousands of project affected communities across India.
The frequent expose of corporate fraud, even amongst leading companies, cause great discomfort when we consider the consequences of such illegal concessions.
An indicative list of the beneficiaries of the concessions proposed include shipping, dredging and port development, building and construction sector, area development projects, special economic zones, mining, petrochemical sector, modernisation of airports, expansion of all sorts of manufacturing industries, etc.
Without doubt each and every one of these sectors have the potential of causing extensive damage to our environment and society, sans effective regulation.
One of the reasons offered for granting such sweeping concessions is that the Ministry failed to create statutory environmental monitoring and clearances agencies, such as the State Environment Impact Assessment Authorities and State Expert Appraisal Committees, in several states since the enactment of the EIA Notification 2006.
Astonishingly, the failure to institute appropriate regulatory infrastructure is now being offered as a reason to comprehensively weaken, even negate, India's environmental regulatory framework.
Nowhere in the history of environmental regulation in the world have such sweeping concessions been accorded by any Government at any point in time.
In fact, such a move is likely to be criticised globally as extending unfair advantage to Indian industry by lowering globally acceptable environmental standards for production, a factor that would weigh heavily against India's standing in the climate change negotiations.
All this considered, we find the reasons cited for the amendment and the timing of the proposed amendments quite specious.
The UPA Government was well aware that its term in office was coming to a close when this Amendment Notification was issued in January 2009, and that too by a Ministry directly under the Prime Minister's supervision.
The concessions proposed by way of this Amendment Notification, besides being illegal and destructive of democratic decision making, constitute a largesse of the State to the beneficiary industries and infrastructure project developers.
The monetary value alone would run into thousands of crores for beneficiaries while severely compromising our ecological security.
It is widely known now that many leading political parties are major beneficiaries of corporate grants.
This proposed amendment amounts to the UPA Government taking advantage of its position to harness much needed resources for elections by offering such astounding and clearly illegal concessions that attack the very edifice of environmental regulation in India.
With this in view, we appeal to the Hon'ble Prime Minister to immediately direct the Ministers of State in charge of Environment and Forests, and the Secretary of the Ministry of Environment and Forests, to issue a public announcement stating that the proposed Amendment has been kept in abeyance till such time a new Government is in power and is able to take a fresh and independent decision on this matter.
We make this fervent request in light of the Code of Conduct issued by the Election Commission of India or ECI, wherein it is clearly and categorically stated that no significant change in existing policy, scheme or programme of the State is allowed at the time of elections.
Conformance with these guidelines are critical to ensuring a Government in power does not abuse its executive privileges to advantage its party at the time of elections.
The proposed amendment to the EIA Notification, being a subordinate legislation, is clearly within the realm of the executive power of the State and thus constitutes a fit case for application of the aforementioned Code of Conduct.
We do hope that the Hon'ble Prime Minister will/would initiate action in this regard with due dispatch.
We'll/We'd also be moving the/this matter before the Election Commission of India or ECI for effective and appropriate action.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This petition's been addressed to:
The Hon'ble Supreme Court, Election Commission of India or ECI, President, Prime Minister or PM, Union Ministry of Environment and Forests or MoEF.
http://www.esgindia.org/campaigns/eia/index.html
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/eianotification2009/
Appeal to the PM against the EIA Notification_Amendment_2009 PDF
1st list of endorsements in ESG petition sent to PM on March 30
Last Petition Update: Tue, Mar 31, 2009 @ 09:45 hrs Indian Std Time
The MoEF (Ministry of Environment & Forests) in a notification issued recently proposes to amend the EIA or Environment Impact Assessment Notification in such a manner that it will negate the very purpose of the Notification, besides compromising human rights of hundreds of project affected communities and the ecological security of India.
It is striking to note that amendment is proposed at the time of General Elections, and that the beneficiaries are the some of the largest corporate houses involved in mining, petrochemicals, manufacturing, construction, infrastructure development, dam building, etc.
All of these sectors are highly polluting and environmentally destructive and the benefit of a weak environmental regime, including exemptions from compliance with significant provisions of environmental regulatory procedures, would help these sectors save thousands of crores in monetary terms alone.
In effect therefore, the proposed amendments amount to the extension of a largesse from the State to highly profit making industrial and infrastructure sectors.
It is well known that corporate houses fund political parties and have consistently demanded and lobbied for a weak environmental clearance regime, including exemptions.
This is exactly what is now proposed by the move to amend the EIA Notification (which is anyway very weak).
The Election Commission of India has a Code of Conduct for political parties which requires that a Party in power should not initiate significant shifts in policies, schemes and regulatory practices that may secure benefits for some sectors and amount to the extention of largesse of the State.
The timing of the proposed amendments and the proposed changes in law leave little doubt about the possibility that the UPA Government at the Centre may have initiated these reforms to secure support of benefiting corporates to its party coffers.
The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has proposed a major amendment to the Environment Impact Assessment Notification - 2006 by way of Notification S.O. 195 (E) issued on 19 January 2009. Following the closure of the public commenting period of 60 days, MoEF proposes to go ahead with the amendments anytime now.
The EIA Notification 2006 requires that projects that cause pollution, displacement, destruction of natural resources, etc., be they in the nature of expansion or as greenfield ventures, must go through a series of clearance steps as per standards and with the prior consent of a variety of statutory agencies, both at the State and Central levels, as applicable.
The procedures laid down requires project developers to comply with various national legislations such as the Environment Protection Act, Forest Conservation Act, Wildlife Protection Act, Water and Air (Control of Pollution) Act, and a range of international treaties, in particular the Rio Declaration of 1992.
In addition a variety of legal principles that are part of the rubric of Indian law, such as Polluter Pays Principle, Doctrine of Public Trust, Precautionary Principle, etc., are to be adhered to when advancing any developmental project.
Failure to comply with the procedures laid down in the EIA Notification is a criminal offence punishable under the Environment Protection Act, 1986 and related criminal procedure laws.
The Amendment Notification proposes a series of amendments to the EIA Notification 2006 which will significantly weaken, even negate, the role of the Ministry and other statutory agencies in reviewing the environmental and social impacts of a variety of high impact and polluting projects.
In addition, the amendment proposes to grant a range of exemptions from mandatory statutory provisions of applicable environmental law for upto three years.
There is also an extraordinary and clearly illegal concession offered to polluters who simply have to declare through a 'self certification' that they cause no additional pollution and thus escape from the need to secure environmental clearance!
In a country which is known for its gross failure in enforcement of environmental regulations, and where there is no competent administrative and regulatory infrastructure to independently review compliance with law, this is certain to open the floodgates to environmental destruction and destabilisation of thousands of project affected communities across India.
The frequent expose of corporate fraud, even amongst leading companies, cause great discomfort when we consider the consequences of such illegal concessions.
An indicative list of the beneficiaries of the concessions proposed include shipping, dredging and port development, building and construction sector, area development projects, special economic zones, mining, petrochemical sector, modernisation of airports, expansion of all sorts of manufacturing industries, etc.
Without doubt each and every one of these sectors have the potential of causing extensive damage to our environment and society, sans effective regulation.
One of the reasons offered for granting such sweeping concessions is that the Ministry failed to create statutory environmental monitoring and clearances agencies, such as the State Environment Impact Assessment Authorities and State Expert Appraisal Committees, in several states since the enactment of the EIA Notification 2006.
Astonishingly, the failure to institute appropriate regulatory infrastructure is now being offered as a reason to comprehensively weaken, even negate, India's environmental regulatory framework.
Nowhere in the history of environmental regulation in the world have such sweeping concessions been accorded by any Government at any point in time.
In fact, such a move is likely to be criticised globally as extending unfair advantage to Indian industry by lowering globally acceptable environmental standards for production, a factor that would weigh heavily against India's standing in the climate change negotiations.
All this considered, we find the reasons cited for the amendment and the timing of the proposed amendments quite specious.
The UPA Government was well aware that its term in office was coming to a close when this Amendment Notification was issued in January 2009, and that too by a Ministry directly under the Prime Minister's supervision.
The concessions proposed by way of this Amendment Notification, besides being illegal and destructive of democratic decision making, constitute a largesse of the State to the beneficiary industries and infrastructure project developers.
The monetary value alone would run into thousands of crores for beneficiaries while severely compromising our ecological security.
It is widely known now that many leading political parties are major beneficiaries of corporate grants.
This proposed amendment amounts to the UPA Government taking advantage of its position to harness much needed resources for elections by offering such astounding and clearly illegal concessions that attack the very edifice of environmental regulation in India.
With this in view, we appeal to the Hon'ble Prime Minister to immediately direct the Ministers of State in charge of Environment and Forests, and the Secretary of the Ministry of Environment and Forests, to issue a public announcement stating that the proposed Amendment has been kept in abeyance till such time a new Government is in power and is able to take a fresh and independent decision on this matter.
We make this fervent request in light of the Code of Conduct issued by the Election Commission of India or ECI, wherein it is clearly and categorically stated that no significant change in existing policy, scheme or programme of the State is allowed at the time of elections.
Conformance with these guidelines are critical to ensuring a Government in power does not abuse its executive privileges to advantage its party at the time of elections.
The proposed amendment to the EIA Notification, being a subordinate legislation, is clearly within the realm of the executive power of the State and thus constitutes a fit case for application of the aforementioned Code of Conduct.
We do hope that the Hon'ble Prime Minister will/would initiate action in this regard with due dispatch.
We'll/We'd also be moving the/this matter before the Election Commission of India or ECI for effective and appropriate action.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This petition's been addressed to:
The Hon'ble Supreme Court, Election Commission of India or ECI, President, Prime Minister or PM, Union Ministry of Environment and Forests or MoEF.
Wenn Sie hier unterzeichnen, akzeptieren Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen von Care2
Sie können Ihre E-Mail-Abonnements jederzeit verwalten.
Sie haben Probleme, dies zu unterzeichnen? Informieren Sie uns.